Analysts Slashed Targets on India’s Top Car Maker. Here’s Why

India’s biggest carmaker delivered volume gains but margin pressures and a Rs 5.9 billion one-time hit have analysts trimming targets

The stock charts tell a familiar story of expectations meeting reality. Maruti Suzuki, the company that put India on wheels, watched its shares tumble over 10% in the past month even as it posted record retail sales. The disconnect between showroom success and share price struggle reveals the uncomfortable truth about what happens when growth comes at a cost.

The Numbers Behind the Noise
Maruti’s third quarter looked impressive at first glance. Revenue surged 29% year-on-year to Rs 498.9 billion. Volumes hit 667,769 units, up 18% from a year ago. Retail sales touched an all-time high of approximately 683,000 units. First-time buyers, many upgrading from two-wheelers, increased their share by 6-7 percentage points.

Yet both Centrum Broking and Nuvama Institutional Equities flagged the quarter as a miss. Centrum noted that results “came in below our estimates” with revenue 1.7% short of projections and profit after tax missing by a substantial 16.4%. Nuvama’s assessment was similarly sobering: earnings came in 5% below estimate, driven by “lower-than-expected realisation and other operating income.”

The headline profit figure of Rs 37.9 billion tells only part of the story. Strip out a one-time expense of Rs 5.9 billion related to new labour code provisions, and adjusted profit reaches Rs 43.9 billion. But even that adjusted number disappointed, with Nuvama pointing to “revenue miss and lower gross margin” as the culprits.

Margin Squeeze From Multiple Direction

The pressure on profitability came from seemingly everywhere at once. Centrum’s detailed breakdown reads like a litany of headwinds: commodity inflation from platinum group metals, aluminium and copper shaved off 60 basis points. Rare-earth related costs added another 20 basis points of pain. Inventory-related fixed cost absorption issues contributed 50 basis points of drag. Adverse forex movements took 15 basis points. Price cuts on select models cost 70 basis points.

The labour code provision alone knocked 125 basis points off EBITDA margins. Gross margins contracted 223 basis points year-on-year to 27.3%. EBITDA margins fell 190 basis points to 11.2%.

Operating leverage of 190 basis points and lower discounts with favourable product mix contributing 120 basis points provided some offset. But the math simply didn’t work in the company’s favour.

Analysts Reach for Their Red Pens

Both research houses responded by cutting their earnings estimates, though they maintained buy ratings. Centrum trimmed its FY27 EPS forecast to Rs 586 from Rs 605 and its FY28 estimate to Rs 698 from Rs 760—reductions of 3% and 8% respectively. The target price edged up marginally to Rs 18,146 from Rs 17,744, implying 22% upside from current levels.

Nuvama took a similar approach, cutting FY26-28 EPS estimates by up to 8% while lowering its target price to Rs 18,300 from Rs 20,000. The firm cited “higher depreciation and lower gross margin assumptions” for the revisions.

The valuation metrics suggest the stock isn’t egregiously expensive but isn’t cheap either. Centrum puts the stock at 25.4 times FY27 earnings and 21.3 times FY28 earnings. Nuvama’s numbers are slightly higher at 26.7 times and 24 times respectively.

The Case for Optimism

Despite the near-term disappointment, both houses see multiple growth levers ahead. Centrum identified “portfolio realignment toward SUVs” as a key driver, noting plans for eight SUV launches by FY31 including the recently introduced Victoris. The GST cut on smaller vehicles has provided what Centrum called “a strong demand kicker” for the compact car segment.

Export volumes remain a bright spot. Nuvama expects 11% compound annual growth in exports over FY26-28, “led by utilization of Suzuki/Toyota network and introduction of new models.” The e-Vitara electric vehicle has already reached 13,000 units across 29 international markets, with the UK emerging as the largest destination.

Capacity expansion continues apace. The Kharkhoda Phase-2 facility with 250,000 units of annual capacity is expected to become operational by April 2026. A fourth production line at the Gujarat plant will add another 250,000 units. Management has announced a second greenfield facility in Gujarat, with capital expenditure running at approximately Rs 100 billion annually.

The Road Ahead

Maruti’s challenge is one of transition. The company that dominated India’s car market with affordable hatchbacks must now navigate the shift toward SUVs, electric vehicles, and premium segments—all while managing input cost volatility and competitive pressures.

Channel inventory has dropped to just 3-4 days, suggesting healthy underlying demand. The order book stands at approximately 175,000 vehicles. Centrum expects volumes, revenues, EBITDA and profit to grow at compound annual rates of 8.6%, 15.5%, 14.6% and 15.3% respectively through FY28.

The sustainability of the post-GST demand surge remains, as Centrum puts it, “a key watchable.” Margins may recover gradually as cost pressures ease, but the quarter demonstrated how quickly profitability can erode when multiple headwinds converge.

For investors, the question is whether Maruti’s dominant market position and ambitious expansion plans justify paying 25 times forward earnings for a company facing structural industry shifts. The market, at least for now, seems less certain.

Recommended For You

About the Author: Faiyaz Hardwarewala